Manning v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because defendant did not provide sufficient information to the trial court that explained the need for additional witnesses, court did not err in denying motion for continuance
• because defendant did not provide sufficient information to the trial court that explained the need for additional witnesses, court did not err in denying motion for continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Danenberg v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-06-25· cited 25×
• Woodward v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-07-15· cited 9×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-05-07· cited 7×
• Manning v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-03· cited 3×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-04-24· cited 2×
• Waters v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-11-06· cited 2×
• Nicole Hines v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-03-05

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Roseboro v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1988-03-03· cited 57×
• Blanchard v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-04-08· cited 55×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1989-02-15· cited 38×
• Gardiner v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-04-04· cited 16×