Skip to main content
· 9/12/1990

Manning v. South Carolina Department Of Highway And Public Transportation

Citations

  • 914 F.2d 44
  • 17 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 853
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that privity within meaning of res judicata focuses on parties’ legal right and relationship to subject matter of litigation
  • explaining that state agencies are not “persons” amenable to suit under § 1983
  • explaining that state agencies are not “persons” amenable to suit under § 1983
  • “When the second dismissal occurs in state court . . . the two dismissal rule applies only if the state has enacted its own version of the two dismissal rule and would therefore treat the second dismissal as a dismissal with prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.