Manning v. North

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• eight and one-half years “is sufficient to establish a rebuttable presumption that appellants have not prosecuted the suit with due diligence”
• co-defendant’s bankruptcy proceeding did not rebut presumption that plaintiffs failed to prosecute suit with due diligence
• Appellee filed a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).