· 3/23/2005
Manning v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Citations
- 198 Or. App. 488
- 109 P.3d 376
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 328
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Without prevailing party status, the Itos were unable to bring 9 their attorney’s fees motion under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act[.] The Itos suffered plain 10 legal prejudice in losing their ability to move for attorney’s fees.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Schuman, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.