· 6/5/1978
Manning v. Dial
Citations
- 245 S.E.2d 120
- 271 S.C. 79
- 1978 S.C. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence created an inference of fraud when the officer of the corporation did not disclose all pertinent facts before signing an agreement to sell stock
- holding that evidence created an inference of fraud where officer of corporation failed to disclose all relevant facts before signing an agreement for the sale of stock which contained a release
- defendant stood in fiduciary relationship to the plaintiff, and as such he had a duty to disclose all relevant facts when purchasing plaintiffs stock
- the managing officer of a corporation owes shareholders a fiduciary duty to make a full disclosure of all relevant facts when purchasing their shares
- as the managing officer of a corporation, the defendant-stockholder had a fiduciary duty to disclose all relevant facts to the plaintiff, the only other stockholder, when purchasing the plaintiffs stock
- as the managing officer of a corporation, the defendant-stockholder had a fiduciary duty to disclose all relevant facts to the plaintiff, the only other stockholder, when purchasing the plaintiff's stock
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Lewis, Littlejohn, Rhodes, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.