· 8/31/1891
Manning v. Den
Citations
- 90 Cal. 610
- 27 P. 435
- 1891 Cal. LEXIS 976
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that application of the right-for-any-reason rule is discretionary
- noting that application of the right-for-any- reason rule is discretionary
- noting that application of the right-for-any-reason rule is discretionary
- noting that application of the right-for-any-reason rule is discretionary
- “Appellate courts, however, retain discretion to apply the ‘right for any reason’ rule on de novo review and consider alternative legal theories or analysis not relied on by the trial court on summary judgment.”
- “Appellate courts . . . retain discretion to apply the ‘right for any reason’ rule on de novo review and consider alternative legal theories or analysis not relied on by the trial court on summary judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.