Manning v. City of Hazel Park

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a governmental immunity defense did not apply to discrimination claims under the Civil Rights Act because the statute expressly included state and political subdivisions as employers covered by the act
• finding that a governmental immunity defense did not apply to discrimination claims under the Civil Rights Act because the statute expressly included state and political subdivisions as employers covered by the act
• “Concerning the sex and age discrimination claims, defendants do not have a governmental immunity defense because the [CRA] specifically includes state and political subdivisions and their agents and employers covered by the act.”
• “Concerning the sex and age discrimination claims, defendants do not have a governmental immunity defense because the Civil Rights Act specifically includes state and political subdivisions and their agents as employers covered by the act.”
• \Governmental immunity is not a defense to a claim brought under the Civil Rights Act.\
• “Governmental immunity is not a defense to a claim brought under the Civil Rights Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).