Manning v. Altman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Rauf decision applies retroactively to “a death sentence that was already final when Rauf was decided”
• holding that Rauf v. State, 145 A.3d 430 (Del. 2016), announced watershed rule
• holding that the defendant’s “death sentence must be vacated and he must be sentenced to ‘imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life without benefit of probation or parole or any other reduction.’” (quoting 11 Del. C. § 4209(d)(2)). 34 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(5
• holding that Rauf applies retroactively
• “Powell’s death sentence must be vacated and he must be sentenced to ‘imprisonment for the remainder of his natural life without benefit of probation or parole or any other reduction.”’ (quoting DEL. CODE ANN. tit. 11, § 4209(d)(2) (2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).