· 7/11/2001
Manning International Inc. v. Home Shopping Network, Inc.
Citations
- 152 F. Supp. 2d 432
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9544
- 2001 WL 789304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[P]laintiff may and should rely on FTC guidelines as a basis for asserting false advertising under the Lanham Act.\
- “At this early stage, when plaintiff has not had an opportunity to submit supportive proof, such a factual analysis is inappropriate.”
- “In a federal action where a federal court is exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state claims, the federal court applies the choice-of-law rules of the forum state.” (citing Rogers, 875 F.2d at 1002
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert L. Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.