Skip to main content
· 7/11/2001

Manning International Inc. v. Home Shopping Network, Inc.

Citations

  • 152 F. Supp. 2d 432
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9544
  • 2001 WL 789304

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[P]laintiff may and should rely on FTC guidelines as a basis for asserting false advertising under the Lanham Act.\
  • “At this early stage, when plaintiff has not had an opportunity to submit supportive proof, such a factual analysis is inappropriate.”
  • “In a federal action where a federal court is exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state claims, the federal court applies the choice-of-law rules of the forum state.” (citing Rogers, 875 F.2d at 1002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.