Skip to main content
· 1/3/1991

Manning Electric & Repair Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 22 Cl. Ct. 240
  • 36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,993
  • 1991 U.S. Claims LEXIS 2
  • 1991 WL 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding exceptional family circumstances existed when the defendant was considered an “irreplaceable” part of his wife’s treatment
  • affirming departure, but remanding because the district court did not impose any type of confinement, but simply fined the defendant
  • finding exceptional family circumstances existed when the defendant was considered an “irreplaceable” part of his wife’s treatment
  • noting spouse required defendant in her life on a regular basis and his constant monitoring in order to prevent her suicide
  • reversing departure because defendant's charitable and volunteer -46- 46 activities were not atypical for a defendant in an antitrust price-fixing case
  • reversing the sentencing court and holding that neither the defendant's early plea nor his help in settling a related civil suit warranted a downward departure under USSG S5K2.0

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bruggink

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.