· 1/3/1991
Manning Electric & Repair Co. v. United States
Citations
- 22 Cl. Ct. 240
- 36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,993
- 1991 U.S. Claims LEXIS 2
- 1991 WL 576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding exceptional family circumstances existed when the defendant was considered an “irreplaceable” part of his wife’s treatment
- affirming departure, but remanding because the district court did not impose any type of confinement, but simply fined the defendant
- finding exceptional family circumstances existed when the defendant was considered an “irreplaceable” part of his wife’s treatment
- noting spouse required defendant in her life on a regular basis and his constant monitoring in order to prevent her suicide
- reversing departure because defendant's charitable and volunteer -46- 46 activities were not atypical for a defendant in an antitrust price-fixing case
- reversing the sentencing court and holding that neither the defendant's early plea nor his help in settling a related civil suit warranted a downward departure under USSG S5K2.0
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bruggink
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.