Mannesmannrohren-Werke AG v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sustaining Commerce’s use of AFA when the respondent simply repeated deficient information following Commerce’s requests for clarification in two supplemental questionnaires
• upholding application of adverse facts available because respondent failed to act to best of its ability in responding to agency’s request for information
• Commerce’s use of average facts available methodology upheld in absence of evidence that a more specific methodology would be more accurate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).