Skip to main content
· 6/12/1986

Mannesmann Demag Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Engineered Metal Products Co., Inc., Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 793 F.2d 1279
  • 230 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 45
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The presence of additional elements is irrelevant if all the claimed elements are present in the accused structure.”
  • File wrapper estoppel prevents a patentee from enforcing its claims against otherwise legally equivalent structures if those structures were excluded by claim limitations added in order to avoid prior art.
  • “Literal infringement requires that the accused device embody every element of the patent claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldwin, Cowen, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.