Mannatech, Inc. v. Wellness Quest, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the same claim term is at issue in the same context, TT’s disclaimer as to the '304 patent applies to the [’055 patent].”
• “[T]he Federal Circuit found that inserting the limitation of ‘common static price axis’ into the claims of the '304 patent prevented TT from asserting that products with price axes that move automatically ... infringe under the doctrine of equivalents.”
• summarizing relevant authorities as “concerned about consistency of constructing claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).