Mann v. White Marsh Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in specific performance action, conflicting inferences from undisputed facts do not defeat alleged vendor’s statute of frauds defense, raised by summary judgment, because part performance avoidance of statute of frauds is not available where inferences are conflicting
• “The Statute of Frauds is not satisfied by part performance based upon acts that are equivocal as to the existence of a contract.”
• The Statute of Frauds “is not satisfied by part performance based upon acts that are equivocal as to the existence of a contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).