Skip to main content
· 4/24/1953

Manley v. Butterfield

Citations

  • 111 F. Supp. 783
  • 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, “if the rule was otherwise, an ‘attorney could always convert a present client into a former client by choosing when to cease to represent the disfavored client’” (internal quotation marks omitted
  • discussing extent of attorney client privilege specifically in regards to nature of legal services performed
  • “The per se rule applies if an attorney simultaneously represents clients with differing interests even though the representation ceases prior to the filing of the disqualification motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holtzoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.