Mank v. West American Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, where an “exclusion endorsement warned the insured that ‘THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY’ and advised the policyholder to read the endorsement carefully,” it demonstrated an intent by the insurer to have the endorsement control the policy
• “No extrinsic evidence of the party’s intent needs to be considered where the contract is determined to be unambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).