Manjit Kaur v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the IJ’s exclusion of petitioner’s son’s testimony violated due process
• holding that the immigration judge violated due process by denying asylum in part due to the lack of evidence corroborating the applicant’s account of events that caused her to leave her country while refusing to hear testimony from the applicant’s son about those events
• remanding for a new hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).