Manitowoc Cnty. Human Servs. Dep't v. J.K. (In re M.B.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing for lack of jurisdiction an appeal of a district court’s remand-with- vacatur that prohibited the agency from enforcing the existing salmon listing
• rejecting the intervenors’ efforts to “tr[y] to parse the district court’s order [by] arguing that setting aside the [rule] is a separately appealable district court decision, distinct from declaring the [rule] unlawful”
• “A remand order will be considered ‘final where (1) the district court conclusively resolves a separable legal issue, (2) the remand order forces the agency to apply a potentially erroneous rule which may result in a wasted proceeding, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).