Skip to main content
· 11/25/1974

Mangum v. Maryland State Board of Censors

Citations

  • 328 A.2d 283
  • 273 Md. 176
  • 1974 Md. LEXIS 699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing definition of “obscenity” in movie censorship law narrowly, in light of First Amendment requirements
  • construing definition of \obscenity\ in movie censorship law narrowly, in light of First Amendment requirements
  • “[cjonstruing statutes in connection with applying statutory provisions to specific cases, is a large and essential part of the judicial process.”
  • Construing the definition of \obscenity\ narrowly in light of First Amendment requirements
  • Construing the definition of “obscenity” narrowly in light of First Amendment requirements
  • no need for prosecution experts and trier of fact not bound by presentation of defendant’s expert even if defendant’s expert was the only one presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Singley, Smith, Digges, Eldridge, O'Donnell, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.