Mangham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that medical evidence is not required to corroborate testimony of the victim of aggravated child molestation
• determining that evidence was sufficient to establish the element of physical injury for aggravated child molestation count, where the victim described the molestation as painful and “testified that her vaginal area hurt throughout the next day”
• “The victim’s testimony indicating the molestation was painful sufficed to prove the element of physical injury.”
• “The victim’s testimony indicating the molestation was painful sufficed to prove the element of physical injury.”
• testimony sufficient to support guilty verdict on aggravated child molestation although uncorroborated by medical evidence
• victim’s testimony that molestation was painful sufficient to prove physical injury element

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-05-12· cited 15×
• Jones v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-09-21· cited 10×
• Moon v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-02-18· cited 9×
• ALLEN v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-05-03· cited 6×
• Kendrick v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-03-13· cited 1×
• Christopher Holmes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-05-23
• Wesley Vick, Jr. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-09-16
• Roderick Tinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-05-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Fitzgerald v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-09-29· cited 31×
• Grooms v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-06-06· cited 12×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-07-24· cited 7×