Mangarella v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Nevada courts must interpret statutes so that they do not conflict with the state or federal constitutions
• holding that Nevada courts must interpret statutes so that they do not conflict with the state or federal constitutions
• holding that Nevada courts must interpret statutes so that they do not conflict with the state or federal constitutions
• holding that Nevada courts must interpret statutes so that they do not conflict with the state or federal constitutions
• holding constitutional a Nevada statute which imposes mandatory polygraph testing as a condition of probation
• explaining that a statute \must be construed as a whole and not be read in a way that would render words or phrases superfluous or make a provision nugatory\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).