Skip to main content
· 6/19/1984

Manetti v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 482 A.2d 520
  • 196 N.J. Super. 317
  • 1984 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that nature of personal injury protection benefits is such that they may give rise to ongoing or recurring disputes
  • no right to jury trial for statutorily-created \PIP\ benefits, which are granted according to principles of statutory construction, not contract
  • There is no right to trial by jury in an action to recover PIP benefits; while a PIP action has been considered contractual in nature, it is a statutory action in view of the mandatory requirements of the PIP statute.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Ard, Morton I. Greenberg and Trautwein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.