Skip to main content
· 3/7/1986

Manetta v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 340 S.E.2d 828
  • 231 Va. 123
  • 1986 Va. LEXIS 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a trial court is not required to give cautionary instructions sua sponte when not requested by a party
  • noting that “[t]rial courts are often required to analyze the real purpose for which evidence is offered”
  • noting that “[t]rial courts are often required to analyze the real purpose for which evidence is offered”
  • though trial judge offered to give a limiting instruction, Manetta made no such request for tactical reasons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.