Manemann v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is ultimately up to the trier of fact to determine whether the voices on a recording have been accurately identified
• “Threats of physical harm need not be directly expressed, but may be contained in veiled statements nonetheless implying injury to the recipient when viewed in all the circumstances.”
• “Threats of physical harm need not be directly expressed, but may be contained in veiled statements nonetheless implying injury to the recipient when viewed in all the circumstances.”
• “That a threat is subtle does not make it less of a threat .... Alleged threats should be considered in light of their entire factual context, including the surrounding events and the reaction of the listeners.”
• “That a threat is subtle does not make it less of a threat .... Alleged threats should be considered in light of their entire factual context, including the surrounding events and the reaction of the listeners.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).