Mandola v. County of Nassau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no hearing was warranted where defendant failed to offer conflicting proof or establish a contested fact to be resolved
• concluding that no hearing was warranted where defendant failed to offer conflicting proof or establish a contested fact to be resolved
• concluding that no hearing was warranted where defendant failed to offer conflicting proof or establish a contested fact to be resolved
• concluding that no hearing was warranted where defendant failed to offer conflicting proof or establish a contested fact to be resolved
• holding that a clear and unambiguous prepayment premium clause was \valid and enforceable under New Jersey law[]\
• explaining that \[i]t is settled that a stipulated damages clause . . . negotiated between sophisticated commercial entities[] is presumptively reasonable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).