Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following a similar procedure where the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended after the district court addressed the legal issue through the improper use of an extraordinary writ
• quashing the decision to the extent that the district court addressed the legal issue through an improper extraordinary writ, but declaring that the rules of appellate procedure must be amended immediately and approving the decision to dismiss the suit
• noting, in the context of workers’ compensation immunity (but, according to the supreme court, applicable in the NICA context as well) that “[t]he court has jurisdiction to decide the question [of exclusivity] even if it is wrong,” and that “the decision will often turn upon the facts”
• a claimant who claims and receives workers' compensation benefits will be found to have elected such compensation as an exclusive remedy where there is evidence of a conscious choice of remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).