Skip to main content
· 11/17/1989

Manderson & Associates, Inc. v. Gore

Citations

  • 389 S.E.2d 251
  • 193 Ga. App. 723
  • 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that billboards were personalty because they could be easily moved with proper equipment
  • construing scope of jury waiver in accordance with general rules of contract interpretation
  • construing scope of jury waiver in accordance with general rules of contract interpretation
  • honoring contract’s choice of Alabama law concerning employment and stock agreements
  • it is not the function of an appellate court to cull the record on behalf of a party
  • it is not the court’s function to cull the record on behalf of a party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birdsong, Deen, Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.