Manders v. Irwin
Citations
- 118 La. 1048
- 43 So. 698
- 1907 La. LEXIS 843
Syllabus
<p>1. Prescriptions — Allegations in Complaint — Admissions by Plea.</p> <p>Allegations put into the petition for the purpose of taking the case out of prescription are not admitted by the filing of a plea of prescription.</p> <p>2. Same — Revival op Debt.</p> <p>A debt on which prescription has accrued can be revived only by the debtor’s consent. A bare payment on the debt is not of itself proof of such consent.</p> <p>TEd. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig, vol. 33, Limitation of Actions, §§ 642-648.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- parties agreed that USCIS had a duty to adjudicate initial EAD applications within 30 days and that USCIS violates this duty
- 30-day regulatory deadline for adjudicating employment authorization
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.