Mandelin v. Kenneally

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the need to withhold inmate names and other information in billing entries to prevent retaliation and preserve privileges
• upholding fee award where the “cumulative effect” of the attorneys’ records allowed the Court to assess the reasonableness of the hours billed
• lower court’s interpretation of consent decree was reviewed de novo but deference was given to its “interpretation based on the court’s extensive oversight of the decree from the commencement of the litigation to the current appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).