Skip to main content
· 1/7/2003

Mandel v. Household Bank (Nevada)

Citations

  • 129 Cal. Rptr. 2d 380
  • 105 Cal. App. 4th 75

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • relying on Szetela in concluding no-class-action provision is unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rylaarsdam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.