Skip to main content
· 7/11/1991

Mancuso v. Southern California Edison Co.

Citations

  • 232 Cal. App. 3d 88
  • 283 Cal. Rptr. 300
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 8460
  • 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 49
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 780

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Placing an article on the market under the Greenman test is the functional equivalent of putting a product in the stream of commerce .... ” (quotations omitted)
  • \Placing an article on the market under the Greenman test is the functional equivalent of putting a product in the stream of commerce . . . .\ (quotations omitted)
  • The California courts \have had little trouble in concluding that electricity delivered to homes and businesses is a `product'\
  • \Electricity which has passed through the consumer's meter has been sold and delivered. It is in the stream of commerce\
  • electricity is a product under strict liability law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.