· 3/18/1985
Mancuso v. Borough of North Arlington
Citations
- 203 N.J. Super. 427
- 497 A.2d 238
- 1985 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1417
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining defamation focuses on injury to reputation, not to one's feelings
- \The truth of the matter is a complete defense to an action based on defamation.\ (quoting WeSav Fin. Corp. v. Lingefelt, 316 S.C. 442, 445, 450 S.E.2d 580, 582 (1994) (per curiam))
- \The truth of the matter is a complete defense to an action based on defamation.\ (quoting WeSav Fin. Corp. v. Lingefelt, 316 S.C. 442, 445, 450 S.E.2d 580, 582 (1994) (per curiam)). We agree. To prove defamation, the plaintiff must show (1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sciuto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.