Skip to main content
· 3/18/1985

Mancuso v. Borough of North Arlington

Citations

  • 203 N.J. Super. 427
  • 497 A.2d 238
  • 1985 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining defamation focuses on injury to reputation, not to one's feelings
  • \The truth of the matter is a complete defense to an action based on defamation.\ (quoting WeSav Fin. Corp. v. Lingefelt, 316 S.C. 442, 445, 450 S.E.2d 580, 582 (1994) (per curiam))
  • \The truth of the matter is a complete defense to an action based on defamation.\ (quoting WeSav Fin. Corp. v. Lingefelt, 316 S.C. 442, 445, 450 S.E.2d 580, 582 (1994) (per curiam)). We agree. To prove defamation, the plaintiff must show (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sciuto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.