Mancini's Bakery v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that existence of preexisting condition does not preclude receipt of workers’ compensation benefits when condition is aggravated by demands of job
• wherein the Commonwealth Court concluded that each day that claimant worked, he suffered a “new” injury in that the work further aggravated his preexisting condition
• wherein the Commonwealth Court concluded that each day that claimant worked, he suffered a \new\ injury in that the work further aggravated his preexisting condition
• “A suspension of benefits is appropriate where a claimant has recovered from his work-related disability to the point where he can return to either his pre-injury job or another job with no loss of earnings____”
• \A suspension of benefits is appropriate where a claimant has recovered from his work-related disability to the point where he can return to either his pre-injury job or another job with no loss of earnings. . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).