Skip to main content
· 4/2/2002

Mancini v. Township of Teaneck

Citations

  • 794 A.2d 185
  • 349 N.J. Super. 527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an adverse employment action does not occur simply because an employee is unhappy
  • holding that an involuntary transfer may qualify as adverse employment action
  • noting that “disadvantageous transfers or assignments” could constitute an employment action, as well as reassignment to “different or less desirable tasks”
  • observing that trial court “properly looked to federal law dealing with Title VII and Civil Rights legislation to determine what constituted an adverse employment action in the context of a LAD retaliation claim”
  • assignment to different or less desirable tasks may constitute adverse employment action and establish prima facie case of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Baime, Newman and Axelrad

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.