Manchester v. Pereira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to “our well established rule that we will not substantively address an issue that was not adequately briefed * * *”
• referring to “our well established rule that we will not substantively address an issue that was not adequately briefed * * *”
• repeating well-established rule that this Court will not substantively address an issue that is not adequately briefed
• “[I]t has long been a settled principle that a party who signs an instrument manifests his assent to it and cannot later complain that he did not read the instrument or that he did not understand its contents.”
• “[I]t has long been a settled principle that a party who signs an instrument manifests his assent to it and cannot later complain that he did not read the instrument or that he did not understand its contents.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).