Manchester v. First Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Moses)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the earmarking doctrine \should not be extended beyond codebtor cases\
• holding that payment of an antecedent debt does not qualify as new value
• holding that the earmarking doctrine “should not be extended beyond codebtor cases”
• stating that the earmarking doctrine should not be extended beyond guarantor situations
• stating that the earmarking doctrine should not be extended beyond guarantor situations
• “[Ejarmarking does not assist in defining the elements of a preference under § 547(b). It is merely a judicially created exception to the requirements of § 547(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).