Mancebo, A. v. CCP Berks County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that Microsoft represented a change in the law from Ninth Circuit precedent such as Omstead
• noting that “an appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up for review only the denial of that motion, but not the underlying judgment”
• setting forth standard of review and explaining that a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) motion must show “extraordinary circumstances” to justify relief
• “[A] change in the 27 controlling law can—-but does not always-—provide a sufficient basis for granting relief under Rule 60(b)[].”
• “[a] movant seeking relief under Rule 60(b)(6) must show extraordinary circumstances 15 justifying the reopening of a final judgment” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “[A]n appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion brings up for review only the denial of that motion, . . . not the underlying judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).