Manasota-88, Inc. v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion in denying a motion to continue filed by the State and noting that the defendant had been free on bond during the pendency of the proceedings
• holding that the district court abused its discretion in denying the State’s motion for continuance and observing, in relevant part, that the State still had time to commence trial under La. C.Cr.P. art. 578(A)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).