Manasco v. Barclay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the plaintiffs position that all downstream services should be deductible “condemnfs] any distinction between marketing and transportation.”
• upholding amendments to the gas royalty regulations making aggregator fees non-deductible
• “a change in the dimension of a cost is hardly an argument for its reclassification”
• noting Interior’s longstanding position that marketing costs are not deductible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).