Mamula v. Satralloy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• entering injunction where many plaintiffs could not afford individual plans and would consequently forego care
• denying stay pending appeal of order granting equitable relief in ERISA case
• insurance plan for, inter alia, laid off employees based upon length of service falls within ERISA
• “To presume that one not able to afford health insurance coverage is harmed only in a monetary sense is to ignore the realities of the situation.”
• court issued an injunction restraining an employer from refusing to make health insurance premium payments where some of the employees could not afford to purchase health insurance or could only afford to purchase limited insurance
• no bond due to retirees’ impecunious financial conditions and likelihood of success

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).