Connecticut Appellate Court· 8/19/2003
Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.
Citations
- 78 Conn. App. 715
- 829 A.2d 47
- 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 368
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[a] fundamental tenet in our law is that the plaintiff's complaint defines the dimensions of the issues to be litigated\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- trial court abused its discretion when it ruled on defendant’s oral motion for summary judgment in violation of procedural requirements of rules of practice because plaintiff objected to this procedure
- defendant filed motion for order confirming judicial admission during pretrial hearings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-06-13· cited 105×
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-05-31· cited 44×
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-12-09· cited 23×
- Merritt v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-09-04· cited 21×
- Hayes v. Caspers, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-16· cited 20×
- Boccanfuso v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-13· cited 13×
- Birchard v. City of New BritainConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-08-07· cited 13×
- National Amusements, Inc. v. Town of East WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-17· cited 11×
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-05· cited 11×
- Magee Avenue, LLC v. Lima Ceramic Tile, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-07-24· cited 7×
- Morton v. SyriacConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-03-03· cited 7×
- Chicago Title Insurance Co. v. Bristol Heights Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-05-07· cited 7×
- Northeast Builders Supply & Home Centers, LLC v. RMM Consulting, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-01-26· cited 4×
- Sosa v. RobinsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-09-22· cited 3×
- Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-01· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-04· cited 110×
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-06· cited 88×
- Pergament v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-08-24· cited 55×
- Pedersen v. VahidySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-01-03· cited 43×
- Milner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-19· cited 32×
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-25· cited 26×
- Hirsch v. ThrallSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-03-21· cited 24×
- Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-27· cited 18×
- Elliott v. Industrial Com'n of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-01-19· cited 17×
- Ferrara v. Hospital of St. RaphaelConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-03· cited 16×
- Dubreuil v. WittConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-14· cited 15×
- Macy v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-09-03· cited 13×
- Harlan v. Norwalk Anesthesiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-18· cited 13×
- Sauerwein v. BellConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-03-21· cited 9×
- State v. MazzeoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-01-07· cited 7×
- Kronberg v. New Hampshire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-23· cited 4×
Other cases named Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.