Mampe v. Kunkel
Citations
- 95 Kan. 602
- 148 P. 741
- 1915 Kan. LEXIS 261
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Implied Contract — Competent Evidence to Prove — Intruction. The defendant offered in evidence a paper not pleaded which he claimed embodied substantially the contract in controversy. In an instruction the court referred to the contract as having been pleaded. No different instruction was requested. Held, no material error.</p> <p>2. Same — Expert Witness — Qualified to Testify. An architect who hears a description of work done by another architect in supervising a building with which the witness is acquainted may properly give his opinion of the value of such supervision.</p>
Judges: West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.