Skip to main content
· 10/4/1983

Mammo v. State

Citations

  • 675 P.2d 1347
  • 138 Ariz. 528
  • 1983 Ariz. App. LEXIS 646

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • because statute specifically set forth social workers’ duties with regard to protection of threatened children, agency could be held liable for its failure to protect child murdered by boyfriend of custodial spouse following unheeded complaint of abuse
  • agency subject to liability for failure to protect child murdered by boyfriend of custodial spouse following unheeded complaint of abuse because statute specifically described social worker’s duties with regard to protection of threatened children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Froeb, Grant, Greer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.