Mamie L. JAMISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that we do not “require the use of particular phrases of formulations” by an ALJ
• concluding that a remand for clarification was necessary because the court could not discern whether the ALJ followed the statutory requirements and related regulations
• recognizing that “the finding of any severe impairment . . . whether or not it results from a single severe impairment or a combination of impairments that together qualify as severe” is sufficient to satisfy step two
• recognizing that “the finding of any severe impairment . . . whether or not it results from a single severe impairment or a combination of impairments that together qualify as severe” is sufficient to satisfy step two
• recognizing that “the finding of any severe impairment . . . whether or not it results from a single severe impairment or a combination of impairments that together qualify as severe” is sufficient to satisfy step two
• providing that remand for clarification is necessary where the court cannot ascertain whether the ALJ followed the statutory requirements and related regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).