Skip to main content
· 8/8/2003

Mamie L. Gordon v. Anthony J. Principi

Citations

  • 17 Vet. App. 221
  • 2003 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 611
  • 2003 WL 21954650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that remand for consideration of an issue for the first time by the Board does not confer prevailing-party status on the appellant
  • holding that remand for consideration of an issue for the first time by the Board does not confer prevailing-party status on the appellant
  • denying the application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA
  • rejecting the appellant's contention that the Court \implicitly\ recognized administrative error where the Court ordered remand to consider a regulation that the Board failed to discuss
  • finding no prevailing-party status where the appellant raised for the first time on appeal an issue that required a remand to the Board for initial factfind-ing
  • rejecting the appellant’s contention that the Court “implicitly” recognized administrative error where the Court ordered remand to consider a regulation that the Board failed to discuss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kramer, Steinberg, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.