Skip to main content
· 8/15/2003

Mamerto D. Valiao v. Anthony J. Principi

Citations

  • 17 Vet. App. 229
  • 2003 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 612
  • 2003 WL 21954461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Board’s error concerning the notice requirements of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA
  • holding that failure to comply with VCAA constitutes nonprejudicial error \[w]here the facts averred by a claimant cannot conceivably result in any disposition of the appeal other than affirmance of the Board decision\
  • holding that failure to comply with the VCAA constitutes nonprejudicial error “[wjhere the facts averred by a claimant cannot conceivably result in any disposition of the appeal other than affirmance of the Board decision”
  • determining that VCAA notice error was nonprejudicial where appellant was not entitled to benefit as a matter of law
  • determining that VCAA notice error was nonprejudicial where appellant was not entitled to benefit as a matter of law
  • determining that VCAA notice error was nonprejudicial where appellant was not entitled to benefit as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kramer, Ivers, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.