Mamantov v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “plaintiffs can, in some circumstances, ‘use prior acts as background evidence in support of a timely claim’ ”
• “[D]is-covery is necessary before the Court could possibly assess the material adversity of the March 2010 reassignment. The Court must therefore deny the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs retaliation claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).