Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 11/30/1972
Mamalis v. Bornovas
Citations
- 112 N.H. 423
- 297 A.2d 660
- 1972 N.H. LEXIS 235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring a joint tenant’s actions to display a clear intent to sever
- “Beginning with several eighteenth and nineteenth century English decisions ... the idea began to emerge that the termination of a joint tenancy should be controlled by the parties’ intention as manifested by some overt act or express agreement.”
- divorce decree and stipulation considered together clearly and affirmatively expressed the parties’ intentions
- “In determining whether an act of a joint tenant is sufficient to terminate or ‘sever’ a joint tenancy, the courts have historically resolved the question upon an analysis of whether the act destroyed one of the essential four unities of time, title, interest or possession.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kenison, Grimes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mann v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado· 1975-05-12· cited 28×
- Bradley v. MannColorado Court of Appeals· 1974-08-26· cited 17×
- Stebbins v. StebbinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-12-08· cited 17×
- Mangus v. MillerColorado Court of Appeals· 1974-12-17· cited 14×
- Grabowski v. GrabowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-11-13· cited 14×
- Lancellotti v. LancellottiSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1977-08-15· cited 13×
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1990-08-29· cited 13×
- In Re the Estate of HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-10-16· cited 10×
- Napier v. Jones by and Through ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1996-05-17· cited 10×
- In RE MARRIAGE OF: LUTZKE v. LutzkeWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-01-31· cited 9×
- Young v. McIntyreWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2008-12-10· cited 7×
- Dubois v. DuboisSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1982-06-11· cited 7×
- Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. PikeFirst Circuit· 2019-02-19· cited 6×
- Estate of Stewart v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1982-12-22· cited 5×
- McBee v. CrosbyColorado Court of Appeals· 1981-08-06· cited 4×
- Edwin Smith, LLC v. ClarkNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-10-19· cited 3×
- Estate of Croteau v. CroteauSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-12-08· cited 3×
- Edwin Smith, L.L.C. v. Synergy Operating, L.L.C.New Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-08-24· cited 2×
- Edwin Smith, LLC v. ClarkNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-12-20· cited 2×
- Doran v. NallyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-09-18· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonald v. MorleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-04-23· cited 45×
- Duncan v. SuhyIllinois Supreme Court· 1941-11-18· cited 34×
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1968-05-29· cited 32×
- Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court· 1963-10-29· cited 30×
- CARSON v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1960-01-23· cited 29×
- Summerlin v. BowdenSupreme Court of Alabama· 1970-10-22· cited 27×
- In Re Frolich EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1972-09-29· cited 16×
- Bouley v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1964-11-30· cited 9×
- In Re Estate of AllaireSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1961-05-31· cited 6×
- Swett v. SwettSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1870-06-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.