Skip to main content
· 10/21/1981

MA&M Inc. v. Supple (In Re Supple)

Citations

  • 14 B.R. 898
  • 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 2741
  • 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because identity of issues in willful conversion suit and non-dischargeability action was not shown, collateral estoppel does not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Krechevsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.