Skip to main content
· 1/11/1929

Malter v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 14 B.T.A. 1208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting, as speculative, the defendant’s argument that the trial court, as finder of fact in action for conversion of automobile, failed to consider the defendant’s asserted good faith
  • presumption of ownership created by vehicle’s certificate of title rebutted where other evidence was “sufficient for the trial judge to make a contrary determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Teammell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.